|
[Back
to Contents Page]
WHEN CHURCHES
JOIN
3. Pitfalls and
other Unexpected Difficulties
- Matters for consideration regarding Property and Resources
The property-owning denomination may
be prepared to enter a Declaration of Trust so that one party
holds the property on behalf of both parties. In other instances
the relationship is that of 'landlord/tenant', with one party
owning the property and the other having access as a tenant.
But beware of entering partnerships with a congregation which
is struggling financially and sees the arrangement as a convenient
source of a financial contribution for the use of the building
(a landlord/tenant relationship). The greater the partnership
in property the better. A landlord/tenant relationship
reflects two unequal partners. Preferable is 'tenancy in common'
with shares reflecting the differing contributions in the
cause.
Points to bear in mind if, however,
a tenancy agreement is negotiated:
- the congregation owning the property
may decide on a new use of their buildings on a Sunday morning,
e.g. two worship services in differing styles, leaving the
'tenant' congregation possibly without a meeting time which
they feel appropriate.
- if the 'tenant' partner congregation
has sold property and invested the monies received into the
property of the 'landlord' partner congregation, and the co-operative
partnership collapses for some reason, the 'tenant' congregation
will no longer have those financial resources. They would
be in no different position from other community organisations
which rented the church building.
If Uniting Church properties are sold
and funds contributed to a joint venture, consider how Uniting
Church members will feel if, for example, it becomes the Anglican
prerogative to appoint the minister. This may come about because
of the question of presidency at the Eucharist, or the stipend
may be funded by the Anglican Church with no provision in
the agreement for the Uniting Church to provide the ministry?
Ultimately, how one congregation puts
its resources into property owned by another must be determined
by the Synod of the Uniting Church and the appropriate authorities
of other denominations acting on legal advice.
Where a Uniting Church building is used
for worship by other denominations, interpersonal interaction
among the communities should be fostered.
The Christians of a country town may
want to join together under a name which does not include
any reference to a denomination. If there is a proposal to
give them Uniting Church property and set them free from all
connections with the Uniting Church or any other denomination,
the committees of Presbytery and Synod would have to be consulted.
The issues involved go far beyond considerations of property.
They include the sense in which an independent congregation
participates in the body of Christ and the one, holy, catholic
and apostolic church, how oversight is to be exercised and
how ministers are to be appointed.
|