[Back to Contents Page]

WHEN CHURCHES JOIN

3. Pitfalls and other Unexpected Difficulties
- Matters for consideration regarding Clergy

It is important that the initiating clergy with the ecumenical vision be left in position until the partnership has been consolidated. Removal of clergy under normal circumstances prior to this consolidation can lead to the collapse of the whole venture, and a situation where it would have been better had there been no co-operation at all. In circumstances where clergy have to be replaced in the short term it is crucial that the denominational appointing bodies appoint someone (whether in the short or long term) who is sensitive to the ecumenical endeavour which is in its infancy. It is often a struggle to overcome old divisions, so personnel must be chosen for their dedication and ability to co-operate and complement one another and to give appropriate ongoing encouragement and support to the venture.

Further, whenever any new appointments are made to churches within the covenant ensure that there is joint participation in the appointment of the minister by all the bodies with oversight, in consultation with representatives of both parts of the congregation. There have been problems when there is a proposal to appoint a minister that one partner considered inappropriate. In addition, if there is only one (joint) congregation, this may mean there is only one minister, and this prospect can be a threat to those who will want to be ministered to by clergy of their own denomination. It is also important to ensure that potential ministers are fully aware of the covenant and its implications because it goes without saying that an appointee with contrary views will soon undermine the co-operation and dismantle the partnership. There is a preference for five rather than three years as the normal term of appointment of ministers in co-operating parishes, with shorter periods being possible and limited flexibility on extensions.

There must be clarity on roles and authority within the congregation especially when parent churches have different views on the role and authority of the Priest/Minister of the Word.

The issue of mutual recognition of the ministry is the major barrier to unrestricted local eucharistic fellowship, but there are ways and means of effecting that most important sharing of all, at the Lord's Table together. Joint retreats for clergy and lay people, as recommended by the Trinity Declaration (iv) may be useful in such situations.

There are rural towns where clergy of all denominations have been/are being withdrawn without ecumenical consultation. What initiative needs to be taken in such a circumstance? What support and assistance is available to ministers who have difficulties coping with complex demands in isolated situations?

A useful inclusive language name for an ecumenical clergy group may be the term 'Ministerium', or more simply, "Ministerial Team".

When the first minister is appointed, there is a tendency to state that the next will be of the other denomination. However it is not wise to predetermine the future situation. A general statement about taking balance into consideration when new appointments occur should be sufficient.